He's not lying

Donald Trump is not wrong with this video:

When Democrats say these things it's supposedly not violence.  Then they make up falsehoods about violence on the right. Not blanketing all Democrat voters, but those who do espouse violence are vile people.

Dinesh D'Souza lays it out on Middle East under Democrats

 Democrat leadership means Middle East flare-ups:

Mostly peaceful violence [Or: How you prove the media are lying]

Show this video to low information voters.  They are a bigger reason president Trump lost the election than the cheating (which was a problem, but not big enough to maintain momentum -- because there were too many low information voters).

When I say they are a bigger reason, I am not talking about the media, I am talking about the low information voters. There's far too many of them. We don't need to take out the media to defeat them, we need to take away their credibility with the uninformed.

Mini AOC doxed by leftists

There is no low to which the hate-filled progressive left will sink, this time outing a little girl.  She got death threats. The Left have no standards, they have no morals, no qualms about violence, no low to which they will not sink in their grotesque hate-filled anger at normal people.

Antifa = violence

Antifa is violent.  Period.  They are communist.  They are domestic terrorists.

Violent milkshakes? Really?

An addendum to my previous post on the mainstream left calling for an escalation of violence - here's Tim Pool once again, talking about Nigel Farage getting milkshaked.

Why is this a thing?  It's beyond stupid.

Mainstream leftists encourage escalation of violence

Violence gets encouraged.  Tim Pool, left-leaning libertarian, calls them out.

Mitt Romney, behind the curve

Yesterday's man.

Hey, Mitt Romney the 2010's called, they want their political correctness back. Mitt Romney, clearly part of the #NeverTrump crowd was quick to jump on the Charlottesville protesters, lumping in peaceful demonstrators with neo-Nazis and the KKK (who were a small part of the original demonstration and not part of the new right.

He tweeted:

No, not the same. One side is racist, bigoted, Nazi. The other opposes racism and bigotry. Morally different universes.

— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) August 16, 2017

But now even Nancy Pelosi is condemning Antifa violence. But there's been nothing new from behind-the-curve Mitt Romney.

Quote of the week - runner up

CNN is busy covering up Antifa violence*

Another great take on the recent Antifa vs. neo-Nazi brouhaha comes from American Greatness, and Robert Kimball's take is equally brilliant;

Trump was correct when he suggested that the alt-Left is just as much a problem as the alt-Right. Indeed, if we needed to compare the degree of iniquity of the neo-nazis, “white supremacists,” and Ku Kluxers, on the one hand, and Antifa and its fellow travelers, on the other, I am not at all sure which would come out the worse. Real Nazis—the kind that popped up like mushrooms in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s—are scary. But American “neo-nazis”? They are tiny bunch of pathetic losers. The Ku Klux Klan was a murderous Democratic terrorist group in its earlier incarnations. Now it too is a tiny bunch (the Anti-Defamation League says it has 5,000-8,000 members) of impotent malcontents.

Antifa has brought its racialist brand of violent protest to campuses and demonstrations around the country: smashing heads as well as property. I suspect that paid-up, full-time members of the group are few, but the ideology of identity politics that they feed upon is a gruesome specialité de la maison of the higher education establishment today.

I also thought that Trump was right to ask where the erasure of history would end. This week it was a statue of Robert E. Lee. But why stop there? Why not pronounce a damnatio memoriae on the entire history of the Confederacy? There are apparently some 1,500 monuments and memorials to the Confederacy in public spaces across the United States. Some of them were erected during the Jim Crow era, something else that was brought to you courtesy of the Democratic Party.

A few quick points - Nazis are socialists, not capitalists. All of the original African American congressmen after reconstruction were Republicans. Maybe we should ask the conniving Democrats if they'd rather erect statues to those men. I can guess what their answer would be.

*Via Daily Wire

Buried lead in the Occupy Oakland chaos story

Oakland.

The Occupy Oakland portion of Occupy Wall Street turned violent yesterday.  Rightly, that was headline 1A:

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - A day of demonstrations in Oakland that began as a significant step toward expanding the political and economic influence of the Occupy Wall Street movement, ended with police in riot gear arresting dozens of protesters who had marched through downtown to break into a vacant building, shattering windows, spraying graffiti and setting fires along the way.

Civil Discourse for Thee, But Not for Me.

And some Democrat double take to go with the Obama double take.  Let's see...Bush = Hitler,  Christie = Gaddafi ,  Walker  = Mubarak,  Conservatives can STFU and violence is okay if it supports Hamas (or the SEIU).  But conservatives are the crazed radicals? Conservatives are the ones not using civil discourse? Civil discourse for thee but not for me indeed.

We all know Democrats are full of double standards and hypocrisy.  But while they get away with it less and less, it doesn't stop them from trying. 

Democrat Kook Arrested For Cantor Death Threats

I don't like getting into the tit-for-tat and they-started-it arguments, but for the record, the man arrested for threatening to kill Republican Eric Cantor, apparently donated to the campaign of Barack Obama. It's tough to stand aside when the left keeps hurling accusations at the right which, quite often are completely unsubstantiated and meanwhile, the FBI has a case, and a confession from this guy.

Famous Mobsters.

You probably know these guys, or at the very least one of them.

They are some very famous mobsters from America's past. But really, nobody has to tell you who they are. They were criminal. They were violent. They were greedy tycoons who lived illicitly as leeches off society by preying on those they could bully into knuckling under. They were extortionists and racketeers.

Today though, a new group of people have been classified as a mob. They're even more dangerous. They're a scary bunch. Beware.

You can see why they're being viewed as a threat to the nation. They look violent. They look immoral. They look out of control. They look as if they've been manufactured by a slick backroom operation. They look seditious. Evil. A lot of them probably have guns. Nobody is safe.

On the other hand, here's a happy group of campers who should be applauded for their quiet reserve. If you want to make a point calm rationale discussion is the way to go. Just like these exemplary people.

These people are not a mob- they are happy Utopians. A shining example of what makes America great. Okay, I just made myself throw up a little in my mouth.

Honestly, I do not begrudge them their right to protest. It's the violence that's totally unacceptable, and that's true for all sides.

Iran - Still a Bloody Mess

June 25th, 2009 It looks like the demonstrations in Iran are winding down. It's not surprising considering the mullahs are using Basij, military units and the police to violently suppress unarmed students, women, soccer players and citizens of the country.

How do you fight back against an oppressive government when you don't have a constitutional right to bear arms? It's tough, nigh on impossible. There's nothing like the 2nd Amendment in the Iranian constitution. So the people have to fight guns and thugs with rocks and flesh. The odds are not in their favor.

The uprising might be quelled soon. But only for now. The genie is out of the bottle now. Whether the change comes to Iran in 2 weeks or 20 years, it will come. And when it does, those who killed Neda, those who suppressed the will of the people, will come to face their justice.

Iran: Horror, yes. Change? Hopefully.

Horror in Iran.

Gateway Pundit has some very graphic and yet moving content on the violence in Tehran. Gateway Pundit has proven an excellent source of details. So has YouTube,



and of course Twitter. The point is, you can't follow this crisis closely through these media, and not be moved to want the protests to succeed. But it's tough to succeed without outside help.

Change? Hopefully. THAT would be 'change we need'. There are protests around the world. There are continued protests in Iran. If they continue to gain momentum perhaps they can affect a regime change.

It's important to realize that the crisis over the election came about as a result of a devastated economy - in turn a result of an over-reaching government domestically in Iran, and of course sanctions imposed by some in the West. This did not come from an Obama speech. This is a natural, homegrown uprising against a corrupt regime. It's a country where 60% of the population was not born when the Ayatollah Khomeini came to power in 1979. It's a country that because of modern technology simply couldn't remain in a Muslim dark ages because they could see the Internet. They can talk to those beyond their own borders.

Too many people are still saying that the US is right to stay as far on the sidelines as possible. That this was a endemic uprising is all the more reason to support the validity of the uprising and to condemn the government for any violence against the people. There's a huge difference between bombing Iran and condemning evil. If this had occurred in Iraq in 1991, as President Bush (41) had urged, things in that country would have gone entirely differently than they ended up going.

These protesters deserve worldwide support. They are in a VERY tough situation - they aren't armed for a rebellion. They are ruled by an autocratic and repressive mullahocracy. They are quite brave to protest. Some strong language is more than desired - it's required.

COWARDICE!!!

Tehran's streets are jammed in oppostion to election fraud and tyranny. Hardliners are firing on crowds.

And this is the Obama White House reaction:

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama says he believes supreme leader Ayatollah ali Khamenei has deep concerns about the civil unrest that has followed the hotly contested presidential election there.

Obama repeated Tuesday at a news conference his "deep concerns" about the disputed balloting. He said he believes the ayatollah's decision to order an investigation "indicates he understands the Iranian people have deep concerns."

But at the same time, Obama said it would not be helpful if the United States was seen by the world as "meddling" in the issue.

The president did say, however, that he worries "when I see violence directed at peaceful protesters, when I see peaceful protest being suppressed."

He worries? He has deep concerns? Well that solves everything, doesn't it? It's shameful, sickening and a dereliction, no, an abrogation, of his duties as leader of the free world!

If the people of Iran successfully rise up against this tyrannical regime, with no thanks to President Obama, he will have rightly earned every acrimony they have for him. If he refuses to stand up for the oppressed even with words of support, his weakness and cynical lack of respect for freedom and democracy will be exposed for the entire world to see. A chance to be a 'lion for the cause of freedom' is being squandered. There is no other word for it besides cowardice.