Sting's hit, Brand New Day.
April 28, 2017
April 27, 2017
We all knew it: The anti-Trump protests are astroturf, bought and paid for by George Soros, who owns, among many other companies, Comcast. The challenging thing is that those who favor the protests, don't care.
Via the Washington Post.
Little evidence exists to back the claim that significant numbers of protesters are paid, or, for that matter, that any significant number of workers seeking a union are “salts.” However, the allegations that even one participant is paid immediately calls into question the legitimacy of a cause. Behind these accusation is the idea that social movements should be entirely spontaneous, volunteer-driven, and untarnished by the exchange of money. Anything else would betray a lack of moral purity and reveal ulterior motives. And although successful protest movements rarely if ever succeed without an investment of resources, we create simplified mythologies that perpetuate these ideas of monetarily immaculate conception.
Citing Politifact as a source for 'little evidence' (as the link in the above paragraph does) is itself laughable. 'Goebbels says Hitler is a good guy'. Great, I guess I was wrong about Hitler then. That issue aside, the mere admission that it does exist, validates that those various publications claiming that it does, are not insane, but have valid concerns. As the left always, always claims when a whiff of conservative misdeeds exists, the mere existence of the claim merits serious consideration (like with the unicorn-y Trump-Russia connection). There will be no double standard here. So WaPo, you are now guilty by your defense of the astroturfers by your discounting of factual evidence because it is politically inconvenient. At least you had the decency to like to Breitbart and National Review in your distasteful defense of duplicitous political behavior that liberals clearly condone and deny exists.
|*See link to this important article at bottom of this post.|
This morning I had planned on detailing some opinion on president Trump's budget proposal. I went on Google to get some details and did a search. Actually I did two searches, and the second search gave me pause because it's probably the more common search term being used. The reason it troubled me was the results, which just provided me a sense of search engine bias.
The term I put in for that second search was "gop budget proposal 2017". The top 2 returns were in regard to the proposal put forward from March 2016 by the GOP. Fair enough, because technically that was the budget proposal for 2017. But look at the next set of results:
7) This is followed by a Forbes article on the 2016 GOP budget proposal, and then back to the current proposal with;
There's the Top 10 list of search results. 2 links to last year's proposal. A conservative friendly view of the same, and 7 negative articles on how terrible president Trump's budget proposal is. Look at the sources - clear a highly liberal group of search results - New York Times, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Politico, Reuters and then a less obviously liberal source The Denver Post (read the article and tell me it is not a liberal bent article).
Search Engine Bias? Intentional or not, yes, yes there is.
April 26, 2017
Kevin O'Leary, Canada's version of Donald Trump so far as politics and celebrity goes, has withdrawn from the leadership race for the Conservative party of Canada;
Kevin O’Leary is dropping out of the Conservative leadership race and endorsing Maxime Bernier because he says he can’t win a general election due to lack of support in Quebec.In a stunning move that will rock the race and solidify Mr. Bernier as the sole frontrunner in the May 27 vote, Mr. O’Leary says he will now put his time and effort into electing Mr. Bernier as leader and helping him beat Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberals in 2019.
So long as ultra-liberal Justin Trudeau is defeated in 2019, it doesn't matter. Unfortunately in Canada Trudeau still is the one that has the celebrity cache.
And that's a good thing.
Via The Hill:
"While the revised version still does not fully repeal Obamacare, we are prepared to support it to keep our promise to the American people to lower healthcare costs," the Freedom Caucus said in a statement."We look forward to working with our Senate colleagues to improve the bill. Our work will continue until we fully repeal Obamacare."The MacArthur-Meadows amendment lets states apply for waivers from ObamaCare provisions that ban insurers from charging sick people higher premiums and mandate minimum insurance coverage requirements, as long as the state offers high-risk pools as an alternative.
This is no done deal at this point, but this is one step in the right direction. The clock is ticking and the GOP know it. President Trump knows it. So this is going to come to a vote. And it's going to pass both houses and be signed.
As the president has indicated, this is a necessary precursor to the Trump budget plans which are expected to be announced today. The fact that the announcement is happening means that unlike the first go around on an Obamacare replacement, the votes have been tallied already on the GOP side and it's a win. The Freedom caucus is on board, Obamacare is toast.
April 25, 2017
With Democrats threatening to shut down the government over funding for a border wall with Mexico, many establishment Republicans have also pushed back against the idea of a border wall. There's a pretty big political miscalculation they have made in not leveraging Democrats.
Every time in the past that Republicans shut down government, it has been a political albatross for them, even when they were right in doing so. While the media may not paint the Democrats' government shutdown the same way they would when the GOP did it (i.e. negatively), there is a fundamental difference. Democrat supporters love government, big government, and they don't want it shut down, ever. Democratic actions to force a shutdown is political hemlock for themselves.
Establishment GOP congressmen and senators don't seem to realize that. Enabling Democrats to have a shutdown means they don't have to get their own hands dirty in the border wall fight (or mere disagreement with the president). They look neither duplicitous, soft on illegal immigration nor actively insubordinate to their Commander in Chief. Neither do they appear complicit to their globalist supporters in having a wall built, should the sentiment turn on Democrats and president Trump succeed in passing a budget with a wall component included.
The GOP cannot be blamed for a shutdown even if CNN calls it a showdown with "neither side budging". Sure the media can try to paint it any other way, but Democrat supporters who love government will know the truth. If your welfare check becomes late/delayed and the penalty for getting it to come is to let Trump have his wall, guess what you'll be thinking.
Establishment Republicans, typically a do nothing lot, are missing an opportunity to do nothing and allowing Democrats to take the blame for the situation. But then, no one has ever accused Republican establishment leadership of tactical brilliance.