Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

August 21, 2025

Trump mega-fine dropped

Finally. The fraud fine against Donald Trump, has been wiped out.

July 25, 2025

Energetic on energy

This is absolutely the correct thing to do:

July 17, 2025

Is Trump dumb?

Trump has made a lot of masterstroke moves during his two presidencies, but it's hard to see a long game in calling out his supporters. Saying he doesn't want MAGA support is not a smart move.

June 7, 2025

Is Trump deliberate in his chaos theory?

Maybe chaos theory isn't the right term. It seems like president Trump operates in a chaotic matter, but deliberately so. The tariffs are a prime example of his negotiation style - attack, retreat, attack, negotiate ad infinitum or at least until it lands where he wants. Another example might be the Elon Musk spat. It seems too sudden, too temporally coincidental with Musk's mandatory departure date from DOGE. 

Now they have a feud? Right at the end of the administration? That seems all too conveniently timed to me. I don't have a problem with it; he's moving the country in the right direction on so many fronts, why worry about his methods and whether they are the best way to do it?  If chaos is working at the moment, use it.

Trump is an expert at media manipulation and this Trump-Musk feud smacks to me of being planned. Musk just mentioned Trump is in the Epstein files. Now the Democrats are clamoring for it's release. Let's face it, they are so desperate to derail him that they'd grasp for anything, even if it means throwing Bill Clinton and any other Democrat they were formerly protecting under the bus, along with Trump. 

Getting Democrats to flip so radically based on one hearsay comment? Too easy. I mean, I could be wrong, quite easily. But the pieces for more Democrat self-derailment seem to be falling into place insanely well. The flip in attitude is crazy. And staunch Epstein story questioners like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino suddenly insisting that Epstein did himself in, also seem strangely timely. As if to lend credence to the notion that Trump has decided that he doesn't want the Epstein files released. It's bait. It's a ruse that Democrats are all too happy now, to bite on.

June 4, 2025

Milk no more

The Trump administration has ordered the US Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, named to honor the gay rights pioneer and Navy veteran. This move, spearheaded by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, is part of a broader effort to align military assets with the navy's traditional values, moving away from tributes to civil rights figures, according to the Washington Post. 

This helps ensure that military honors reflect traditional American values and avoid politicization. The original naming of the ship after Harvey Milk, a figure primarily known for his activism in the gay rights movement, is yet another example of progressive agendas influencing military decisions.

I have nothing against Harvey Milk, and make no judgement on his personal preferences. That is 100% entirely his own business. However, military assets should honor individuals whose contributions align closely with national defense and traditional service, ONLY; not based on social or political activism. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a focus on military readiness and cohesion, free from cultural or political controversies.

The move merely reflects an effort to depoliticize military honors and reinforce traditional values within the armed forces, ensuring that such recognitions are reserved for individuals whose contributions directly pertain to national defense and service. The new name is expected to be revealed on June 13th.

April 29, 2025

Jordan Peterson makes my second point about Trump's bad call

I spoke about this earlier:

Canadian Election Disaster Trilogy

This is not the total disaster I had feared. Liberal, World Economic Forum golden boy Mark Carney was parachuted in to save the Liberal Party of Canada from the disaster known as Justin Trudeau. Notice he wasn't parachuted in to save Canada, but to save the Liberal Party. Pick your theatrical villain, this guy is it: 

Yep, that's him with the associate of you-know-who.

Sadly, Canada is full of uninformed people (due largely to our lock-step Leftist media), weak-willed cowards with a knee-jerk reaction to president Trump's tariffs.  

Going into the election, the Conservative party had a somewhat charismatic (in an understated way) leader unafraid to take on the media, unafraid to talk common sense. He was winning so much support, it looked possible that the Liberal party could be actually wiped out entirely. Less than four months ago, Conservatives were a certainty. Meanwhile the Liberals had historically unpopular Justin Trudeau. A global laughing stock of a leader.  After a decade people tend to tire of the incumbents, that's true anywhere not just Canada. 

There was a lot that went wrong with Canada's populist revival, and it was a perfect storm of sh@% that resulted in a Liberal 4th consecutive term, albeit barely. What happened? Three things mainly.

One - Too soon, too personal

Well the first problem was the Conservative party's strategy worked too well. Once Pierre Poilievre was elected leader of the party the strategy to demonize Justin Trudeau starting years before the election date worked. It worked so well, that along with Justin Trudeau's own contribution of ineptitude and horrible policies,  the Liberals approval ratings were near flatline. The problem though was twofold. Firstly they started way too early. The other problem; it was too Trudeau-centric. The Conservative popularity soared and Trudeau's waned abysmally as he deserved. But because this happened a year before the mandated latest election date, and because it was so closely tied to Trudeau, the Liberal party was able to jettison Trudeau and solve both problems at once.  A 'fresh' 'new' face cleared punted the problem for the Liberals. 

True, nobody wanted Trudeau, not even liberal voters. But he was no longer on the ballot. The Conservatives were a victim of their own early success. Liberals had time to present themselves, along with a compliant media as revitalized and different.  It's not true, as has often been pointed out, but it became the perception. Liberal voters flocked back to Liberal support, abandoning the other parties (mostly the NDP) they had drifted towards.
 
Two - I have to say it; Donald Trump

At one point probably 60% of conservative voters in Canada were very much pro-Trump for America. President Trump coming in and going after Trudeau with tariffs was a real miscalculation. Canadians didn't see it as an attack on the Trudeau they for the most part detested. They saw it as an attack on Canada. We've been a loyal friend to the United States for over a century. This about face made no sense. There are trade issues on both sides for sure, but we're not China.

Trump created a climate of fear in Canada that permeated the election cycle. It was now about Canadian sovereignty. That gave Pierre Poilievre a no-win hand to play. Endorse Trump and seem anti-Canadian to most of the country or talk tough and say Canada First. He had to chose the latter or get decimated in the election. But choosing the latter meant that he was just like the Liberals. This may have also been a strategic mistake. There was probably a third path; a path of reconciliation with America.  A path of let's address the concerns of both countries. But it would have taken an enormous campaign to get that message through and per point one; the Conservatives went through a lot of budget before the election even got started and probably couldn't muster the resources to carry that off.

President Trump inserted himself into a Canadian election in a way that hurt Conservatives' election chances. It may have been a deliberately gamble to help the Conservatives but if so, it failed. Badly. While addressing trade grievances and fentanyl issues are certainly important and admirable, this was ill-timed and will end up hurting working class and middle class Canadians who are suffering badly already thanks to their Liberal overlords. I know, I am one of them. The Canadian economy for ordinary Canadians is on the ropes. This could spell the death of Canadian middle class. 

Three - Jagmeet Singh

The clown of a leader for the New Democratic Party (socialists), Jagmeet Singh was so self-serving that for years he propped up Justin Trudeau, holding on as long as he thought was possible. If he had had any backbone, Canada could have held an election any time over the last two years. Didn't happen. He kept Trudeau in power long enough to give the Liberals time for an alternative. Singh earned himself enough tenure for a lucrative lifetime government but he lost his own seat in parliament in the election as a result. He decimated his own party to a rump in parliament with virtually no power anymore. And it cost Canada. If he'd been less a Trudeau lacky Canada would have had a conservative Prime Minister and his NDP party would have been better off too. His selfish and progressive ambitions have made Canada a country on life support.

There's your trilogy of reasons for the disaster. There's a trilogy of disastrous outcomes for Canada, we are stuck with more World Economic Forum leftist leadership. We have a squandered opportunity for conservative populism and for a reinvigorated relationship with the United States

Not all is lost

I started by saying this was not the complete disaster it could have been. It's true.  The Liberals do not have a majority government in parliament. Support from the ruined NDP party won't be enough to keep them in power now. They are subject to a non-confidence motion and a snap election at any time. The conservatives and the Bloc Quebecois (who don't like the Conservatives but detest the Liberals) will likely see to it that the government lasts 18 months or less. My gut says 9 - 12 months. People will have time to see Carney is every bit the villain that Justin Trudeau was. A conservative majority is still a looming possibility, perhaps merely delayed.

April 19, 2025

Canada following behind America again?

Canada moving back to the right, right before the election. After the left's post-Trudeau euphoria blasted the Liberals back into first place in the polling, polls have done a U-turn. Hopefully a strong enough one that Pierre Poilievre wins big. We'll see. Canada needs some common sense back.

March 21, 2025

More unintended consequences on Trump Canada tariffs

Just an FYI, this is worth the watch from a party that was sincerely and strongly pro-Trump just months ago:

March 18, 2025

Trump's fallout in Canada is horrible

The Conservative party in Canada as recently as December had a 29 point lead in the polls. This is what has happened since Trump's tariffs pronouncements.


Canadians have rallied around the Liberal government and it's new leader in response to what they perceive as a bully. Canada had the potential to elect a strong leader who would be an effective and strong ally of the United States. That opportunity may now be lost. The leftist Liberals have surged not only back into the race but potentially have enough support to win in a landslide. With a multi-party system, 42% is enough to dominate parliament.

I have been a strong Trump supporter since 2016. I cannot think of any other issue where I would not back him. His approach to Canada is the one area he has been wrong.  Unless Trump did not want an ally and was serious about annexation he's made Canadians' lives, already bordering on miserable, far worse. And I don't think he's serious about annexing Canada. 

I still back Trump. I simply think his approach here has been horribly wrong.


February 24, 2025

Quote of the week

This week there are two great quotes tied for the Quote of the Week (which does not pop up here on a weekly basis to be fair).  Bothe quotes come from Victor Davis Hanson, and from the same article. They are both in reference to Trump's approach to the Ukraine-Russia war.

The first quote is to assuage the left's gleeful panic over Trump's not appearing to recognize that Russia did indeed start the war. Hanson points the truth out very early in the article:

Putin did start the war. Trump’s trolling aside, he knows that because he correctly pointed out that Putin invaded his neighbors in three of the last four administrations—but not his own, given Trump’s deterrence.

The second quote concludes the article with Hanson's presumption about Trump's recent tactics on the matter, which I share - it's about negotiating without giving up your position, and indeed, even more than that:

For all the media screaming and left-wing accusations, Trump’s recent antics have at least accomplished the following: the NATO nations, Ukraine, and Russia are all confused about what Trump is saying, and so now all the more want him to stop the war.

Truth. 

January 27, 2025

Trump to Colombia: FAFO

Colombia refuse the military transport planes returning Columbian illegal immigrants into America back to the country. Trump did not pull any punches in response, and it resulted in a quick re-think on the part of the Colombian. The explicit phrase FAFO applies well here.

By the way, this was summarized more succinctly on a popular reaction channel on YouTube than on any major news network's social media I could find. That too is telling.

January 1, 2025

Trump just got out-trolled

Pierre Poilievre may have just outdone Trump for trolling.  This is an amazing must-see trolling of Justin Trudeau and his cadre of fools:

December 27, 2024

What 2025 may bring

At Breitbart, a look towards 2025 and some of the real, and tough issues facing the incoming Trump administration:

President Trump will not have an easy time controlling inflation, a problem that has historically only been solved with economic pain. Securing the border will also be an extremely difficult task, not to mention the question of what to do with millions of people who have entered the country illegally in the past several years.

There may be opportunities for peacemaking in the Middle East, but there will also be new challenges: the Syrian rebels who ousted the Assad regime, for example, include hard-core Islamic terrorists who are already threatening Christians and other minority groups in the region. Russia and Ukraine are still at war, and China is still a growing threat — not just in the western Pacific, but elsewhere.

More broadly, we have long-term problems — the debt, the declining birthrate, the epidemic of loneliness — that will require sensitive approaches. We have elected a president who prides himself on being a disruptive force; the challenge of rebuilding will be our own.

Inflation is indeed going to be a tough one to tackle. The money printing that has happened over the last 4 years make it especially tough to overcome quickly. But the energy policy and the immigration fixes (especially deportation) will definitely have a faster impact than fixing monetary and fiscal policy. That will help for sure. 

While wars are a big problem, I have less concern about Trump's ability to broker deals and I think he will make relatively quick work of solving those issues.

With respect to the long term issues mentioned in the article, those are things that will take longer than a single presidential term.  JD Vance will need to step up in 2028.

December 20, 2024

Congress is starting to work? Maybe?

This is a good, pre-Trump start:

December 15, 2024

Well, let's hope so.

DOGE may be taking some cues from Argentina's Milei, and that would be a good thing:

December 7, 2024

Presidential

This:


They made the video private. "Fools! They will pay hehehe..."

December 4, 2024

November 29, 2024

Japan gets CCP to back down

You may have missed this important geopolitical news; Japan has stood up to China and I think it's in large part because of Trump's election victory Japan has felt emboldened and China has been cowed. 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share This