Eric Adams and the politics of Democratic destruction

I'm no fan of Eric Adams, but the prosecution of the New York City mayor seemed awfully political. Now it seems even more plausible:

Um, what?

JUST IN: DOJ lawyer Michael Dreeben says it's perfectly fine for Obama to drone strike innocent civilians while arguing in favor of prosecuting Trump for "election interference."

Remarkable.

The comment came after Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh cornered Dreeben by asking… pic.twitter.com/sNmHj7VwZo

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 25, 2024

I think it is reasonable to consider the president ordering drone strikes against a terrorist target not a prosecutable offense, even if unfortunately, innocent foreign civilians are killed. But then contrast that position to the president questioning the veracity of election results as being a prosecutable offense and it just becomes weird. Really, quite, weird.   

Persecution for thee but not for me

Prosecution and not prosecution depends on who you are.  Compare these two clips:

Seriously, what gives?

Hillary Clinton standing over a dead body with a bloody ax, still might avoid prosecution.  I wonder if the subliminal message from Comey is that Hillary Clinton is above the law and therefore doesn't deserve your vote. Possibly, but these are not subtle times.  Perhaps Comey didn't get the memo on that.  Otherwise, seriously, what gives?