Unconstitutional!

Mark Levin, unfiltered, discussing how the appointment of Jack Smith to target Donald Trump is unconstitutional.

Warren goes unConstiutional

Elizabeth Warren wants to tax and re-tax wealth. Not income, actual wealth. UnConstitutional.

Ignore the redistribution proclivities in the video, even debaters on the stage with Warren said the proposal was unConstitutional.

Krugman - still in a tinfoil hat

Photo via Death by 1000 Papercuts.

Whenever I get bored by the political landscape - we're in a gap between GOP primaries right now - there are a few places I can go to get inspired to write something.  I've been busy of late and I haven't been doing that, but today I have some bandwidth and I went back to one I haven't in quite a while: Paul Krugman.  For a Nobel Prize winner, he rarely fails to bring a tinfoil hat perspective to the table.  With the Supreme Court taking a look at the Constitutionality of Obamacare, Krugman has decided that he needed to scold the Supreme Court on their lack of understanding of how health care is different from broccoli.

Don't be fooled - There ARE NO free condoms!

There is no such thing as free anything.  Do you really want the government deciding what you get for free, what you have to pay for, and what you have take whether you want it or not?

Peter Schiff waxes eloquently (or perhaps just riffs really well) on the Obamacare mandate for coverage of birth control for women. Why it's unConstitutional and about a hundred other reasons it is a really bad idea.  The unintended consequences will be mostrous.  Watch:

More two word opinions

Once again I'm on the receiving end of swamped.  Here's some quick thoughts on some topics in the news.

The Senate is pushing through Debit Card fee capping. Unintended Consequences.

Obamacare may be unconstitutional. Ya think?

Fairness Doctrine going away? About time.

Dems see end to GOP's Wisconsin wave with recall efforts. Counting chickens.

Breitbart upset about Weiner picture leak. He's clear.

That's it for now.  I'm still swamped...

Obamacare deemed unconstitutional. Duh.

Ya  think?

Spoiler alert - this ain't over. In any case, some comforting analysis for conservatives, Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post hits the nail on the head;

Liberal pundits who have consulted liberal law professors about liberals' great achievement -- ObamaCare -- are pronouncing the ruling by Judge Roger Vinson to be much to do about nothing. The ruling is. . . um. . . thinking of a case liberals hate.. um... just like Bush v. Gore ! (Except it has nothing to do with the Equal Protection Clause or any other aspect of that case.) It is, we are told, "curious," "odd," or "unconventional."

These are complaints, not legal arguments. And they suggest that the left was totally unprepared for the Constitutional attack on their beloved handiwork. After all, the recent mocking by the left of conservatives' reverence for the Constitution suggests they are mystified that a 200-year old document could get in the way of their historic achievement. They are truly nonplussed, and so they vamp, not with reasoned analysis but with an outpouring of adjectives.

Liberals are particularly perturbed by Judge Vinson's ruling on severability, the determination as to whether the individual mandate is so central to the law as to make the law unrecognizable and unenforceable without it. But here, the left has only the administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress to blame.