I've got a job interview - actually a phone screen interview - this morning and yesterday I came down with a wicked head cold and some sort of infection. Timing is almost everything. Nevertheless I will muddle through as best I can, because perseverance and preparedness have to count for something, right? Details matter.
If I were the president and these scandals were all unfolding, I would make sure that I controlled how the information about each of these scandals came out. I wouldn't be surprised if the terrible leader was still being a very good politician and doing everything he can behind the scenes to control not only the spin on everything coming out, but the timing.
I hope his political opponents are thinking the same thing. Look at the Guardian interviews with whistleblower/traitor Snowden on the NSA leaks. Not everything came out at the same time, and the ACORN investigation/sting run by James O'Keefe was bled out slowly with one video at a time. It made the scandal loom larger, hold the public consciousness longer and also gave the agency enough rope (time) to hang itself by claiming, each time, that these were isolated incidents.
My point is simple - those involved in investigating these scandals are facing a hyper-political administration. There had better be some thought going into managing the politics and the timing of revelations. All at once could overwhelm the administration and also the public's perception, but it could also result in a temporary impact. It could also mean that the various scandals will compete for the headlines and to a degree, cancel each other out. That may be what the president is hoping to have happen. On the other hand, a slower, staggered release of scandal-related material may have a longer lasting impact but take longer to take hold. There are pros and cons to how to handle all these concurrent scandals. I'm not sure that Republicans are staying on top of how to manage them all, but they should be.
Meanwhile, I hope my voice holds up for an hour.