Lawsuit alleges Zuckerberg grants for election officials

Right on the heels of a post talking about president Trump being cleared in the baseless charges levelled against him in New York, there's this story from Breitbart:

A lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry in October 2020 alleged that an obscure nonprofit organization operated as part of a larger nonprofit founded and largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaire Pierre Omidyar attempted to recruit local election officials to apply for grants from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL).

Landry filed the lawsuit on behalf of the State of Louisiana against CTCL, New Venture Fund DBA Center for Secure and Modern Elections, Dawn Maisel Cole, a private individual; and Full Circle Strategies LLC, “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money into the Louisiana election system.”

But let's be clear, this could go nowhere just like the trumped-up Trump charges in New York. It could be baseless, even though there is probably something to it in my opinion. But it's a lawsuit and that's all it is at this point.  Let's hope Jeff Landry has his facts together on this and the lawsuit succeeds in revealing nefarious activities.

Even if it goes somewhere it may not result in anything significant. Nonetheless, let's hope if it is true it is problematic for Zuckerberg.  He's been a far leftist tool for years and there should be repercussions.  

Liz Warren falsely attacks Facebook

...and I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook knew about this ahead of time.  After all Zuckerberg has begged to be regulated.

There's something serious to this

Last week Gateway Pundit posted a somewhat humorous series of jabs about Hillary Clinton's desire to be CEO of Facebook.  The idea is silly.  Facebook would not be moving away from Fake News but literally embracing a specific agenda.  While Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg might share a political viewpoint with the heavily left-leaning former first lady and twice-failed presidential candidate, the move seems like it would invite far too much criticism to be a serious consideration for the company.

HILLARY CLINTON WANTS TO BE CEO OF FACEBOOK.

BECAUSE ONE SERVER WITH SENSITIVE INFORMATION ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ISN’T ENOUGH.https://t.co/iSAcEfOrqz#OneServerToRuleThemAll pic.twitter.com/O8Y1vURfWw

— Dr. Duke Pesta (@DukePesta) May 25, 2018

But the underlying issues are serious: (1) both Twitter and Facebook have exhibited anti-conservative activities, not just bias.  Gateway Pundit and Project Veritas have both exposed some of this in the past.  And the potentially more serious (2) Hillary Clinton is still seeking ways to warp the political direction of the country to both the far left and to ways that can somehow benefit her financially.

I can only speculate as to how (so I won't at this point), but there's no indication that those dual goals have been abandoned by the Clintons.  While the Democrats seem to finally be trying to distance themselves from the death grip of the Clintons, clearly Hillary is not ready to cede authority and will continue looking for new avenues to advance her agenda, even if it is not via the presidency.