Showing posts with label Citgo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citgo. Show all posts

July 6, 2009

Pent up demand for conservative products

It's only been 8 months since the 2008 electoral massacre that the GOP suffered. In that time, Republicans have gone through a bewildering range of incidents - the Limbaugh versus Powell chronicles, the Sanford drama, the RINOs versus the base in-fighting, the relief of the Arlen Specter defecting, the spectacle of Coleman versus Franken and it's preposterous conclusion, the Meghan McCain versus anything conservative side show, and now the Palin resignation conundrum.


You'd figure that the GOP is approaching the point of being irretrievably lost. You'd be wrong. The President's over-ambitious agenda, which has it's own lessons for conservatives*, and is ineffectual foreign policy have left him easily within striking distance. Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and Harry Reid have all left themselves open for a lot of criticism. And while they may not all be on the bubble individually, they've certainly tarnished the Democrat brand overall.


Both sides have damage to repair. Meanwhile there's a pent up demand for all things conservative, since the ability to do much at all, either in Washington or in the media, is clearly severely limited. What are conservatives to do? Where do we go to find solace or conservative sustenance? There are servings of red meat available from sources like Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin et. al. But that doesn't satisfy every need. Conservatives are in a position of relative powerlessness in a time when the country needs a steady rudder. It has led to Tea Parties - conservatives borrowing a page from history and a technique from 60's liberals - mass protests.


But other outlets are needed and there are some obvious choices and they aren't as hard as you'd think. For starters try voting with your wallet. As much as it pains me to say it about an American company, consider boycott GM until it's been fully re-privatized. Any bank that has the burden of TARP funds over it's head (i.e. federal ownership) is a bank that you can consider not banking with. Of course everyone should consider boycotting socialist gas from Hugo Chavez' Citgo. And why would any conservative, unless they are monitoring liberal propaganda should avoid reading the New York Times, and not watch MSNBC.

But it goes further than that. Proactively send your money where conservative values are not betrayed, or at least treated equally. Watch Fox News. Go further just avoiding MSNBC - they're owned by NBC which is owned by GE. These companies are directly or indirectly supporting the destruction f your country. Look where your money is being spent. Do you watch NBC at all? Do you but GE light bulbs?

Protests are one thing, but the truism 'follow the money' is never more true than in an economic downturn or even a recovery. Put your dollars where they don't betray your beliefs. Yes it requires some effort, but it's something you can do in your every day life that ultimately helps or does not betray your principles. Rahm Emmanuel was right - every 'crisis' is an opportunity. In this sense, conservatives have a lot more power than they realize that they simply aren't using.

And don't let the guilt of putting people out of work discourage you. Sure, you put people out of work at Citgo. But the demand doesn't go away - it moves. Those jobs will be needed elsewhere - either with competitors or upstarts who are taking up the slack in demand.

The same holds true for candidates. Contribute and work for conservative candidates. Do not do so for those who aren't really holding true to your ideals, unless it comes down to lining up against a Democrat. Obama has proven a RINO is better than a socialist. Even if it's a matter of degrees*, just try to live your beliefs.



*The lesson to learn is that the ONLY way to succeed is in incremental success. Anything more will result in a serious backlash and is less likely to be permanent. Progress works best in incremental doses. Time is the only solution. Look at the creeping liberalism that has infected America versus Obama trying to get the grand slam all at once. The creeping version is tolerated because each change is relatively small. But when the change is ominous, opposition coalesces against it.

February 16, 2009

Dictator Watch - Feb 16, 2009: Chavez Edition


He's finally done it. After failed attempts to ratify the Venezuelan Constitution so he can install himself as El Presidente for life, Hugo Chavez has finally got his wish. Vladimir Putin must be eating his own liver.


CARACAS, Venezuela – President Hugo Chavez says a referendum victory that removed limits on his re-election is a mandate to intensify his socialist agenda for
decades to come. Opponents warn of an impending dictatorship. Both sides had
called the outcome of Sunday's vote key to the future of this South American
country, split down the middle between those who worship the president for
redistributing Venezuela's oil riches and those who see him as a power-hungry
autocrat.

"Those who voted "yes" today voted for socialism, for revolution," Chavez thundered to thousands of ecstatic supporters jamming the streets around the presidential palace. Fireworks lit up the Caracas skyline, and one man walked though the crowd carrying a painting of Chavez that read: "Forever."

After previous frustrations, how did this finally come to pass? Some are claiming that Chavez cheated. While there is no concrete proof (yet), it would not come as a surprise if the truth bears out this claim.

CNN reports that Chavez has kicked out of the country an European observer
because had referred to Chavez as a dictator! Obviously the truth hurts! What is
amazing is that Venezuelans are forced again to go and vote tomorrow February 15
for the same issue that they had voted against on December 2, 2007, and where
Chavez was defeated. Nevertheless, the infamous Chavez had to run the same
question again! It seems that the deranged leader does not understand that NO
means NO!

The story from CNN can be found here.

Apparently there have been no widespread reports of voting irregularities. This can be confirmed because the same phrase shows up on many major news sites.

ABC News (Australia): "Electoral authorities and independent observers say there was a very high voter turnout and that the ballot was carried out without significant irregularities."

NY Times: "Voting across the country unfolded calmly, without reports of widespread irregularities, electoral officials said. "

International Herald Tribune (England): "Voting across the country unfolded calmly, without reports of widespread irregularities, electoral officials said."

Well obviously it must be true...

Don't expect the Obama administration to come down hard on Chavez. But there are things as an American citizen you can do on your own to put a dent in this tinpot dictator. Boycott Citgo. It's just a suggestion, but Citgo is owned by Petroleos de Venezula, and has been since 1990. However, it won't do much beyond the symbolic because oil companies buy oil from each other and shopping at say Chevron, you could still be supporting crude sourced in Venezuela. Nothing short of an official embargo would suffice. That won't happen without public outrage, and that's not likely to happen when there are more important economic issues to deal with right now.

But that doesn't mean that driving an extra block to the Texaco station isn't doing your part. It's certainly better than the alternative of not caring. It's the same principle as not standing up against the Fairness Doctrine - you get the result you deserve.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share This