The moderators were not moderating the debate they were supporting panicky Tim Walz and still JD Vance was able to kick butt in the debate. It was brilliant. When polling comes in I'm sure it will be a win for Vance. I'm equally sure, though it won't be polled, Vance pointing this out further chipped away at the abysmal levels of trust for the mainstream media.
Unfortunately, I'm also sure this debate will do little to move the polling, as VP debates have only a small impact. I would caveat that a little here; it might mean more than normal, but just not a lot more.
I'm shocked that the fairest debate this election cycle was conducted by CNN (not really). Debate moderators have become useless given that they are all so left-biased now.
How about the questions are pre-packaged and displayed on a screen to the participants and microphones are automated to turn on and off at set times? No people involved whatsoever. Questions can come from sources proposed by candidates and accepted by their opponents. For example Vance could request 10 questions come from Fox and Walz could request 10 from CBS. The questions would be asked alternately between both sources. Just a thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disagreement is always welcome. Please remain civil. Vulgar or disrespectful comments towards anyone will be removed.