Normally I wait when I see something on Hillary Clinton, in order to put it in my Thursday Hillary Bash. It offers consistency for readers and it gives me time to digest the news item and organize my thoughts about it. But sometimes something is too good to ignore for a few days and this is one of them. Hillary Clinton apparently, is ruthless. This could have been put out by those seeking to strengthen her image as being tough - a quality leaders need to posses. But if that's the case, politically, does this do more damage than good for her?
On May 12, 1992, Stan Greenberg and Celinda Lake, top pollsters for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, issued a confidential memo. The memo’s subject was “Research on Hillary Clinton.”Voters admired the strength of the Arkansas first couple, the pollsters wrote. However, “they also fear that only someone too politically ambitious, too strong, and too ruthless could survive such controversy so well.”Their conclusion: “What voters find slick in Bill Clinton, they find ruthless in Hillary.”The full memo is one of many previously unpublished documents contained in the archive of one of Hillary Clinton’s best friends and advisers, documents that portray the former first lady, secretary of State, and potential 2016 presidential candidate as a strong, ambitious, and ruthless Democratic operative.The papers of Diane Blair, a political science professor Hillary Clinton described as her “closest friend” before Blair’s death in 2000, record years of candid conversations with the Clintons on issues ranging from single-payer health care to Monica Lewinsky.The archive includes correspondence, diaries, interviews, strategy memos, and contemporaneous accounts of conversations with the Clintons ranging from the mid-1970s to the turn of the millennium.Diane Blair’s husband, Jim Blair, a former chief counsel at Tyson Foods Inc. who was at the center of “Cattlegate,” a 1994 controversy involving the unusually large returns Hillary Clinton made while trading cattle futures contracts in the 1970s, donated his wife’s papers to the University of Arkansas Special Collections library in Fayetteville after her death.The full contents of the archive, which before 2010 was closed to the public, have not previously been reported on and shed new light on Clinton’s three decades in public life. The records paint a complex portrait of Hillary Clinton, revealing her to be a loyal friend, devoted mother, and a cutthroat strategist who relished revenge against her adversaries and complained in private that nobody in the White House was “tough and mean enough.”
Their conclusions may be incorrect, but there is reason to see sense in what the pollsters found, especially when her alleged comments are considered. Thee's tough, and there's vindictive. Voters may like the former but nobody likes the latter. Politically this may hurt Hillary more with her liberal supporters than with conservatives, who already don't like her and are pretty much locked in against her. Liberal supporters however, probably like to believe that they are nice, giving and above such things and would expect to see the same in their leaders. This flies in the face of Obama's attempts to empathize ('the folks are hurting') and even her husband ('I feel your pain'). It also dovetails well as evidence when viewed with the recent disclosure of her enemies list.
This is the sort of thing that needs to have eyeballs on it, particularly liberal, Hillary-supporting eyeballs.