Yesterday, someone left a copy of the New York Times on the train. I don't normally get to see the NYT, because (1) I'm in Canada, not New York, and (2) I certainly wouldn't buy one at a local newsstand here (yes, many do carry it, as well as USA Today and the Washington Post) because I'm well aware of their biases.
So, out of curiosity I picked it up to peruse the articles. A lot of what gets reported about the New York Times are their more liberal pieces. I found out that the reason is because most of their articles are indeed from a very liberal bent. That was certainly the case yesterday at least.
There's so much I could comment on and point out their liberal slant, but the effort would be tiresome. Bias aside, there was one article about the docket for the Supreme Court in its term that started yesterday. Strip out the bias and there is some important factual stuff in there about a number of precedents that are in play and could be overturned by the Supreme Court. Among them are issues relating to political contributions, the First Amendment, government prayers, federal treaties, affirmative action (again) and abortion.
That is indeed news, and worth conservatives taking note over. Good reporting in this instance, but bad editorializing. Honestly though, who among us reads the NYT? It's a shame they are so clearly liberal that conservatives that cannot stomach it, do not bother to read the NYT paper. I found the article online, you can read it here, if you really want to do so.