And it's going after Liz Cheney; this is not a Trump revenge investigation. It's a truth hunt, not a witch hunt.
Showing posts with label witch hunt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label witch hunt. Show all posts
December 18, 2024
August 2, 2023
March 24, 2023
August 9, 2022
The big takeaway from the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago
The big takeaway from the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago yesterday? The January 6th commission (aka witch hunt), has got absolutely nothing on president Trump. Otherwise why would the FBI be bothering to raid and try to manufacture evidence? The FBI has become irredeemably corrupt by participating in the witch hunt perpetrated by the Democratic party.
How did the president respond? With this epic and brilliant video.
Labels:
2022,
FBI,
January 6th,
Mar a Lago,
president Trump,
raid,
takeaway,
witch hunt
May 5, 2019
#WaronFreedom - episode 3
The time to stand up to Facebook, Twitter, Patreon, et. al. is now because what they are doing, now more obviously than ever, is singularly a political witch hunt to purge conservatives. It is also a war on freedom.
Who is standing up to them, along with president Trump? We all should be.
July 20, 2017
Mueller is fishing for Trump dirt
Special investigator is expanding the probe of the president into his business transactions - as far back as he feels like. Now is the time for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to un-recuse himself and cancel the probe. This is nothing more than free opposition research of the president for the 2020 presidential election at this point.
Democrats will try to justify it as trying to determine if there were motives for collusion. Donald Trump was an international businessman. He's had dealings with Russians as well as multiple other nations. This is not just a witch hunt, it's tinfoil hat conspiracy theory fodder and people will see what they want.
President Trump said yesterday that had he known Sessions was going to recuse himself he would not have appointed him as attorney general. That may be a signal to Sessions to consider a reversal of the recusal.
May 11, 2017
Left Atwitter
Everyone who was screaming for former FBI Director Comey's head (or job at least) when he reopened the Hillary Clinton investigation in October is now screaming that his firing by president Trump is unjust. How do you take someone with that sort of flip-flop in position seriously?
Answer: You can't.
The whole Russia investigation is a political witch hunt to destroy president Trump. For 7 months this supposed investigation of president Trump's White House has led to absolutely zero charges. It will eventually lead to zero charges. If Hillary Clinton could get away with keeping classified documents in an unsecure environment ( a very serious crime with a lot of evidence) then this pursuit of Trump collusion with Russia (with no evidence revealed so far, and none forthcoming) is destined to fail.
But that's not the point is it? The point is to smear the president indelibly so that he not only cannot win re-election in 2020 but he cannot govern effectively in the interim. The point is to invalidate his mandate in the minds of the public. And it's working - so far only with liberals and Democrats already predisposed to hate the president anyway. But they did this same thing with the second president Bush and they tried to do it with Ronald Reagan (without success).
So far Trump is doing many of the right things policy-wise. The economy is rebounding on the speculation of the implementation of his economic agenda. But it's becoming clear that he is not the next Reagan. In the face of the onslaught, he has not elevated his communication to the level of Ronald Reagan. Perhaps he can't.
In the face of the onslaught though, I'd urge conservatives to stand fast, so long as president Trump continues to attempt to deliver on his campaign promises.
January 13, 2014
Why conservatives should rally around Chris Christie right now
Really? Help Chris Christie? Look, I understand that Chris Christie is not our favorite conservative. And I understand that he is not who we most want to go up against Hillary Clinton in 2016. I know we all think that she should be beatable by anybody (though that notion will look less and less likely as the media eventually all jump on her bandwagon) in the next presidential election. And I know that he's exhibited traits of RINOism. A lot of conservatives are probably feeling relief that his inevitability on the GOP nomination has taken a hit. Personally, I would prefer at this point he not be the GOP nominee for a number of reasons. But...
April 14, 2010
Here's a happy paranoid thought
As if you need something else to worry about as far as an ever more intrusive big government goes, I've got one for you. I'm not a paranoid alarmist conspiracy theorist, I'm simply pointing out that the possibility exists and we are now one step closer to that possibility than we were less than one year ago.
February 3, 2010
Toyota Recall and the Political Witch Hunt
Isn't the government being a bit predatory in having The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration start an investigation into Toyota accelerator problems? After all, they are a majority stakeholder in GM. It's not the first instance of an assault either. Or the second since the Obama administration.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a big fan of Japan's selectivity in terms of free trade;
Here’s a scenario you didn't see: The North American International Auto Show got underway last week and not a single Japanese car was allowed. Such a slight would be unthinkable, but it’s not far from what Japan did recently when it chose to exclude U.S. autos from its “Cash for Clunkers” trade-in program.
The gall is astounding. In 2009, when the U.S. began to formulate a “Cash for Clunkers” program, Congresswoman Betty Sutton (D-Ohio) had proposed that any such legislation extend only to cars produced in North America. Overseas automakers quickly responded in an uproar, and the $3 billion U.S. program was instead made open to all fuel-efficient cars, no matter their country of origin.
In amazing contrast though, the Japanese government recently adopted its own Cash for Clunkers program and not a single car from the Detroit Three was made eligible. Rep. Sutton is outraged and has been joined by Michigan Sens. Debbie Stabenow and Carl Levin, as well as Reps. Sander Levin and John Dingell, in protesting this stunning lack of reciprocity.
Clearly foreign markets are not altogether as free as they are in North America. Those of us who advocate free trade have to make sure that when we are promoting the virtues of free trade, we are dealing with a level playing field, otherwise we are simply setting ourselves up to be patsies. Free trade is a good thing unless on side of the trading partnership is gaming the system. Even then, retaliation in the form of protectionism, as organized labor would have it, is not the answer. Free trade benefits consumers as well as producers and consumers should not be punished. Instead, figuring out alternative means to open up foreign markets to American products is the best way to go about leveling the playing field.
But all that aside, has the government adapted a form of soft protectionism? Is the government trying to placate unions by punishing Toyota? Is Honda next? More importantly, is the government using it's position as a player in the automotive game (by way of it's GM ownership), using it's role as referee (in it's role as government) to protect it's investment in GM?
You simply can't be a player and the referee and expect to remain neutral. And even if you could, you can't expect others to see you as neutral. There's an ever-present danger, all too real given human nature, to stack the deck in your own favor. No one could conclusively make the case that this is what's going on but it sure looks wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


